A few weeks ago, I had the opportunity to help out a labmate with her research
on the Mokelumne River (and take a classic fish photo.) Unfortunately, I didn’t
catch it angling… an electro-fishing boat caught it. For those who haven’t
heard of this, it’s a boat that sends out pulses of electricity through the
water to momentarily stun fish, a common way to catch them for fisheries
research. Cheating? Perhaps. But the fish aren’t hurt, and it’s a whole lot
easier (though less fun) than fishing all day to catch your sample size quota.
Striped bass classic shot |
E-fishing boat courtesy of collaborator EBMUD: the hanging metal cables shock the water |
We were up on the Mokelumne, which joins the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
near San Francisco, to remove all the striped bass from a pool below an
irrigation dam. California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is plagued by many
problems, and foremost among them is the conflict over water needs between
agriculture and ESA-listed native fish populations, including salmon,
steelhead, and Delta smelt. As a result, a lot of effort goes into trying to
figure out what is causing high mortality in native fish populations, and what
can be done to boost survival. One possible culprit: striped bass.
The last thing the juvenile salmon sees (looking down the striped bass gullet) |
Striped bass are native to the Eastern U.S., and were introduced to
the west coast as a game fish, a sadly familiar story. (As an interesting
sidenote, Wikipedia lists many common local names for striped bass, including striper,
linesider, rock... and my favorite, pimpfish). Striped bass eat juvenile salmon
(see my post from last October), so one suggestion for boosting salmon populations
is to decrease predation pressure by attempting a large-scale striped bass
removal, through unlimited fishing allowances. But will this work?
My labmate is looking at an interesting aspect of this question. She
is measuring juvenile salmon mortality as the fish move past an irrigation dam,
both when striped bass are present in the pool below the dam, and when they are
absent (through removal). The idea is to see if salmon mortality drops
dramatically when the bass are absent, or if other predators in the system (some
of them native, like the pikeminnow) fill the predatory niche, making removal ineffective…
or perhaps even exacerbating the problem, since striped bass also prey on some
of the other fish that eat salmon. If striped bass are removed, this would
release these other predator populations from bass predation pressure as well,
and could potentially cause a sharp rise in other predator populations. (For a
more complete, interesting discussion of this topic, check out well-known
fisheries biologist Peter Moyle’s post on the California WaterBlog).
The fieldwork for this project was quite fun, involving many slippery,
spiny fish and a beautiful day in the California sun. I joined in for the bass
removal day, so a group of juvenile salmon had already been released through
the dam the previous day and mortality measured while striped bass were
present. We were there to remove most of the striped bass, prior to another
salmon release. To remove striped bass from the pool, an electro-fishing boat made
four passes through the pool below the dam, shocking the water and catching a
cross-section of the fish community each time. Striped bass key in on pools
below dams, where salmon coming through are funneled through a small area in
large numbers, providing an easy feast for waiting predators, so this pool is
usually full of bass around this time of spring, when juvenile Chinook are
out-migrating to the ocean.
The irrigation dam and pool |
We took striped bass diet samples to get an idea of what proportion of
the bass diet is made up of juvenile salmon. This is done through gastric
lavage (aka making the fish barf by flushing them out with water). The only
downside to this is that the spines on the dorsal fin of striped bass are
surprisingly sharp, and fish are slippery and wiggly. Suffice it to say that I
got some war wounds.
Barfing a fish |
One striped bass' breakfast |
We then returned all other fish species to the pool, but retained the
striped bass and transported them to another river later that day. It will be
interesting to see the results of this research. However, I doubt very much
that removing all striped bass from the Sacramento-San Joaquin system will be enough
to cause significant increases in salmon populations. The Delta is a highly
altered system—it used to be an extensive wetland, and is now mostly
agricultural fields and channelized habitat—so extensive habitat restoration will
likely be needed to help restore native salmon populations. However, this is a
complex question that deserves its own post. Stay tuned.
But predator removal could well be a part of the solution, and
hopefully this study will help us determine whether this is true. Striped bass
for dinner, anyone?
The crew (fish and human) |
And most importantly... when you're doing fieldwork in the sun all day, you have to be innovative about how to keep the chocolate snacks from melting |